Main Article Content
Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites (SNS) that recreates face-to-face interactions on the web by allowing people to interact publicly or privately. Many people use Facebook as a way to stay in contact while others use it to develop new connections. The objective of this study was to investigate how Facebook serves as medium in preserving romantic relationships of faculty members, staff and students of the university. The study used a descriptive-survey and correlational research designs to determine if there is a relationship between the variables. A questionnaire was utilized to determine respondents’ use of Facebook and status of romantic relationships in terms of partner surveillance, relationship satisfaction, self-disclosure and social intimacy. The results revealed that Facebook influence the preservation of romantic relationship as the study found a slight positive relationship between the partner surveillance and relationship satisfaction. The increase in partner surveillance will lead to an increase of relationship satisfaction; hence the absence of it can push a relationship into a negative state. However, other important factors like affectionate communications can lead to relationship satisfaction. Therefore, it was recommended that a strong communication/interaction between couples is needed in maintaining romantic relationship; there is a need of a school program to guide the students, faculty and staff in handling healthy relationship and affectionate communication shall be given value in maintaining romantic relationship.
Countries with top Facebook penetration to population; socialbaker.com; 2013.
Bryant E, Marmo J. Relational maintenance strategies on facebook. Conference Papers –National Communication Association; 2009;1. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research. 2011;19:52–90.
Darvell J, Walsh SP, White KM. Facebook tells me so: Applying the theory of planned behavior to understand partner-monitoring behavior on facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking. 2011; 14(12):717-722.
Hampton KN, Goulet C, Rainie L. Why most facebook users get more than they give: The effect in Facebook power users’ on everybody else; 2012. Available:http://pewinternet.org/reports/2012/Facebook -users.aspx
Cha J. Factors affecting the frequency and amount of social networking site use: Motivations, perceptions, and privacy concerns. A great cities initiative of the University of Illinois. Chicago University and Library; 2010.
Peter P, Valkenburg P, Schouten A. Characteristics and motives of adolescents talking with strangers on the internet and its consequences. Cyber Psychology & Behavior. 2006;9(5):526–530.
Altman & Taylor, as cited Carpenter & Greene Social Penetration Theory. Available:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic160
Kim N, Lee JE, Park JY. Hi! My name is Clora: The effects of self-disclosing agents on the attitude and behavior of users. International Communication Association, Annual Meeting. 2006;1-38.
Farrugia RC. Facebook and relationships: A study of how social media use is affecting long-term relationships. Available:http://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=theses Accessed September 4, 2013.
Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site. Understanding the use; 2011.
Berg EC, Trost M, Schneider IE, Allison MT. Dyadic exploration of the relationship of leisure satisfaction, leisure time, and gender to relationship satisfaction; 2011.
Rau PP, Gao Q, Ding Y. Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computer Human Behavior. 2008;24(6): 2757-2770.
Parks MR, Adelman MB. Communication networks and the development of romantic relationships: An expansion of uncertainty reduction theory. Human Communication Research. 1983; 10:55-79.
Floyd K. Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context; 2006.
Guerrero LK, Anderson PA, Afifi WA. Close encounters: Communication in relationships (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage; 2011.