Main Article Content
Aims: This study evaluates teachers' perspectives on the integration of guided mobile learning through the Mobile Intervention Module (MIM) in English language teaching. As previous studies suggested that there are conflicting views among scholars with regards to mobile usage in classroom learning, this paper attempts to address scholars' concerns by suggesting English language teachers' opinions on the possibility of having practical guided mobile learning activities to complement the course contents.
Study Design: This study adopts a qualitative approach.
Place and Duration of Study: Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, Malaysia, between February 2019 to July 2019.
Methodology: Interview sessions are conducted among four language instructors to see how they perceive the effectiveness of guided mobile learning intervention towards teaching and learning. Content Analysis is later adopted to analyse the interview data where specific themes are derived. The concept of MIM that incorporates appropriate web learning tools is developed and explained. MIM functions as a comprehensive guide that matches the course contents to the most appropriate web learning tools.
Results: The results show that all instructors perceive guided mobile learning through the MIM positively. This study implicates that guided mobile learning could be useful in facilitating the teaching approach shift from conventional to technology-assisted, enabling the integration of interactive activities in learning, developing specific language skills and enhancing engagement. It should also be noted that there may be some adaptation barriers of mobile learning that can hinder learning process.
Conclusion: While it is recommended that mobile learning is integrated with lessons, to achieve effective results, however, as suggested in the findings of this study, it has to be guided, thus a proper module that links the syllabus to the mobile apps needs to be created.
Mattheos N, Schoonheim-Klein M, Walmsley AD, Chapple IL. Innovative educational methods and technologies applicable to continuing professional development in periodontology. Eur J Dent Educ. 2010;14(1):43–52. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00624.x
Koszalka TA, Ntloedibe‐Kuswani G. Literature on the safe and disruptive learning potential of mobile technologies. Distance Education. 2010;31 (2):139–157. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2010.498082
Ng SF, Hassan NS, Nor NH, Malek NA. The relationship between smartphone use and academic performance: A Case of students in a Malaysian Tertiary Institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2017;5(4):58-70.21 [cited 2020 Nov 1];
Woodcock B, Middleton A, Nortcliffe A. Considering the smartphone learner: Developing innovation to investigate the opportunities for students and their interest [Internet]. Student Engagement and Experience Journal. 2012;1(1):1-5. [cited 2020 Nov 1] Available:https://doi.org/10.7190/seej.v1i1.38
Ng SF, Azlan MAK, Kamal ANA, Manion A. A quasi-experiment on using guided mobile learning interventions in ESL classrooms: Time use and academic performance. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr)] 2020;29:1. [Cited 2020 Nov 1]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10191-7
Beland L, Murphy RJ. Ill communication: Mobile phones and student performance. London School of Economics and Political Science; 2014.
Yu F, Conway AR. Mobile/smartphone use in higher education. Proceedings of the 2012 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute. 2012:831-9. [Cited 2020 Oct 15] Available:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d989/2c3788755797ceb70058008ad2dce2518053.pdf?ga=2.71315923.1372799406.1597763870-1721685326.1585926198
Herman M, Pentek T, Otto B. Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) [Internet]; 2016. [Cited 2020 July 20]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2016.488
Nichols JR. Essential rules of 21st Century Learning [Internet]; 2018;4. [Cited 2020 Nov 1]. Available:http://www. teachthought. com/learning/4-essential-rules-of-21st-centurylearning
Wilson SD. Leading edge online classroom education: Incorporating best practices beyond technology. AJBE. 2018;11(3):41-8. [Cited 2020Dec.16]. Available:https://www.clutejournals.com/index.php/AJBE/article/view/10187
Shield L, Kukulska-Hulme A. Special issue of ReCALL on mobile assisted language learning; 2008. [Cited 2020 Sep 19]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400800013X
Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM. Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning [Internet]. Frontiers in psychology. 2017;8:605. [cited 2020 Sep 19] Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00605
Sparrow B, Liu J, Wegner DM. Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science. 2011;333(6043):776-778. [Cited 2020 Sep 19]. Available:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.120774
Barr N, Pennycook G, Stolz JA, Fugelsang JA. The brain in your pocket: Evidence that smartphones are used to supplant thinking. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;48: 473–80. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.029
Junco R. In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computer Human Behavior. 2012;28:2236–2243. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.031
Goh T, Kinshuk D. Getting ready for mobile learning - Adaptation perspective. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2006;15(2):175-198.
Yunus MM, Nordin N, Salehi H, Embi MA, Salehi Z. The use of information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching ESL writing skills. English Language Teaching. 2013;6(7):1-8. [cited 2020 Sep 19]. Available:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n7p1
Kelly A, Safford K. Does teaching complex sentences have to be complicated? Lessons from children’s online writing. Literacy. 2009;43(3):118-122. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2009.00501.x
Lacina J. Technology in the classroom: Promoting language acquisitions. Childhood Education. 2004; 81(2):113-115. Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2005.10522253
Hudson A. Measuring the impact of cultural diversity on desired mobile reference services. Reference Services Review. 2010;38(2):299-308. Available:https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321011045052
Lund A, Hauge TE. Designs for teaching and learning in technology rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. 2011;4:258–271. Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297477123_Designs_for_Teaching_and_Learning_in_Technology-Rich_Learning_Environments
Hauge TE, Dolonen JA. Towards an activity-driven design method for online learning resources. In: Olofsson A, Lindberg J, editors. Informed Design of Educational Technologies in Higher Education: Enhanced Learning and Teaching . Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 2012; 101-117. Available:https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-080-4.ch006
Barrs K. Mobility in learning: The feasibility of encouraging language learning on smartphones. Studies in Self-access Learning Journal. 2011;2(3):228-233. Available:https://sisaljournal.org/archives/sep11/barrs/
Zaki AA, Yunus MM. Potential of mobile learning in teaching of ESL academic writing [Internet]. English Language Teaching. 2015;8(6):11-9. [cited 2020 Oct 15] Available:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n6p11
Lai C. Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2020; 51(3):721-742. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
Erlingsson C, Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;7(3): 93-99. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
Mackey A, Gass SM. Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4 ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Limited.); 2012.