The End of Neoliberal Globalism: A Critical Perspective

Main Article Content

Ishmael K. Hlovor
Yussif Shaibu
Naazia Ibrahim


There has been a growing trend towards protectionism, particularly in the Global North in recent years. The rise of Trump, Brexit and tighter immigration control across Europe and America seem to run contrary to the conventional neoliberal globalism discourse of free flow of people, capital, goods and information across the globe. Using a qualitative approach and drawing on data from published works, this paper argues that these events are part of the Global North’s rebellion against neoliberal globalism. This process is not external to the process of neoliberal globalism but integral to it. Although the current rise of nationalism and protectionism does not represent an end of globalization, it represents the end of the discourse of globalization as a fit all economic and political solution to diverse nations. This demands that alternatives to the current thinking be considered. A new form of globalization must consider issues of income and economic inequality among nations and people. It must offer the chance to the nation state to reinvent itself as the welfare providing and protecting states.

Neoliberalism, critical theory, globalization, brexit, nationalism

Article Details

How to Cite
Hlovor, I. K., Shaibu, Y., & Ibrahim, N. (2021). The End of Neoliberal Globalism: A Critical Perspective. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 14(1), 1-10.
Original Research Article


Bhagwati J. The new international economic order: The North-South Debate. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1978.

Singer HW. The new international economic order: An overview. The Journal of Modern African Studies. 1978;16(4):539-548.

Rao N. "Neocolonialism" or "Globalization"?: Postcolonial theory and the demands of political economy. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies. 2000;1(2):165-184.

Sharma RK. Globalization as politics of neo-colonization: Teaching English language in higher education in Nepal. Journal of NELTA Surkhet. 2018;5:106-112.

Devetak R. Critical theory. In S. B. al (Ed.), Theories of International Relations (3ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2005;137-160.

Geus R. The idea of critical thinking. London: Cambridge University Press; 1981.

Moon J. Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge; 2008.

Cox R. Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981;10(2):126- 155.

Ashley RK. Political realism and human interests. International Studies Quarterly. 1981;25:207.

Punch KF. Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2013.

Levitt HM, Motulsky SL, Wertz FJ, Morrow SL, Ponterotto JG. Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology. 2017;4(1):2–22.

Gergen K. An invitation to social construction (3ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015.

Galbin A. An introduction to social constructioinism. Social Research Reports. 2014;26:82-92.

Jackson R, Sorensen G. Introductionto international relations theories and approaches (3ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Wendt A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization. 1992;391- 425.

Cox JR. Memory, critical theory and the argument from history. Argumentation and Advocacy. 1990;27(1):1-13.

Schneider SK, Jacoby WG. Elite discourse and american public opinion: The case of welfare spending. Political Research Quarterly. 2005;58(3):367-379.

Smith A. The geopolitics of information: How western culture dominates the world. New York: Oxford University Press; 1980.

Schiller H. Culture, inc: The corporate takeover of public expression. Oxford: Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.

Van Dijk TA. Elite discourse and racism. London: Sage Publications; 1993.

Thurlow C, Jaworski A. The discursive production and maintenance of class privilege. Discourse and Society. 2017;28(5):535-558.

Schraeder PJ. Elites as facilitators or impediments to political development? Some lessons from the "Third Wave" of democratization in Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas. 1994;29(1):69- 90.

Rodrik D. Has globalization gone too far? Challenge. 1998;41(2):81-94.

Lamp N. How Should we think about the winners and losers from globalization? Three narratives and their implications for the redesign of international economic agreements. The European Journal of International Law. 2019;30(4):1359– 1397.

Awolusi OD, Adeyeye OP. Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Africa. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2016;14(2-2):289-297.

Almfraji MA, Almsafir MK. Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth Literature Review from 1994 to 2012. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;129:206-213.

Asatryan, Zareh et al. Compensating the Losers of Globalisation. WWW for Europe Policy Brief. 2014;(4).

Williamson J. Winners and losers over two centuries of globalization. In: In wider perspectives on global development. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.

Kapstein EB. Winners and losers in the global economy. International Organization. 2000;54(2):359- 384.

Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press; 1992.

Smith J. The fall of soviet communism: 1985-1991. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.

Williamson J. The washington consensus and beyond. Economic and Political Weekly. 2003;38(15):1475- 1481.

Gore C. The rise and fall of the Washington consensus as a paradigm for developing countries. World Development. 2000;28(5):789-804.

Kaya A, Reay M. How did the Washington consensus move within the IMF? Fragmented change from the 1980s to the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. Review of International Political Economy. 2019;26(3):384-409.

Schatz SP. Structural adjustment in Africa: A failing grade so far. The Journal of Modern African Studies; 1994;32(4):679-692.

Stein H, Nissanke M. Structural adjustment and the African crisis: A theoretical appraisa. Eastern Economic Journal. 1999;24(4):399-420.

Thomson M, Kentikelenis A, Stubbs T. Structural adjustment programmes adversely affect vulnerable populations: A systematic-narrative review of their effect on child and maternal health. Public Health Rev. 2017;38(3).

Lall S. Structural adjustment and African Industry. In learning from the asian tigers. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1996.

Fröbel F, Heinrichs J, Kreye O. The new international division of labour. Social Science Information. 1979;17(1):123- 142.

Mkandawire T. The road to crisis, adjustment and de-industrialisation: The African case. Africa Development / Afrique et Développement. 1988;13(1):5- 31.

Bangura Y. Structural adjustment and de-industrialisation in Nigeria: 1986-1988. Africa Development / Afrique et Développement. 1991;16(2):5- 32.

Goodwin M, Heath O. Brexit vote explained: poverty, low skills and lack of opportunities; 2016. Retrieved 01 15, 2021. Available:

Becker S, Fetzer T, Novy D. Who voted for Brexit? München: Ifo Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschungan der Universität München; 2017.

Becker SO, Fetzer T. Does migration cause extreme voting? CAGE Online Working Paper Series. 2016;306.

Gietel-Basten S. Why Brexit? The Toxic Mix of Immigration and Austerity. Population and Development Review. 2016;42(4):673-680.

Tilford S. Britain, immigration and Brexit. CER Bulletin. 2016;(105).

McQuarrie M. The revolt of the rust belt: Place and politics inthe age of anger. The British Journal of Sociology. 2017;68(S1):120-152.