Ethical Issues in Educational Research

Ibrahima Haneef *

Department of Education, Regional Institute of Education (NCERT), Ajmer, Rajasthan, India.

Manish Agrawal

Indian Institute of Teacher Education, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Ethical issues are important aspects of research to make research practice honest and transparent. The researcher must follow specific rules and ethical guidelines to meet the expectations of the research community and academia. These rules and regulations are for fairness and integrity in the field of research. In this research paper, the authors have made a solemn effort to delineate the critical ethical issues and how they can degrade the quality of research and cause trouble to any investigator. This paper focuses on ethical issues, ethical standards, guidelines, and concerns of artificial intelligence so that no researcher faces any problem before, during, or after the study. As technology expands and its integration into education, teaching, and research emerges, the authors have stipulated that artificial intelligence can be a concern and threat to ethical standards in educational research.

Keywords: Ethical issues, ethical standards, ethical guidelines, artificial intelligence, educational research

How to Cite

Haneef, I., & Agrawal, M. (2024). Ethical Issues in Educational Research. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 22(5), 29–38.


Download data is not yet available.


Kour S. Ethical and legal issues in educational research. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 2011;4(6):133–135. Available:

Johnson B, Christensen L. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (4th ed.), USA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2012.

Ethical considerations for including women as research participants. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(1). Available:

Velasquez Andre C, Shanks T, Meyer MJ. What is Ethics? Issues in Ethics IIE V1 N1 (1); 1987/2010. Available:

Singer P. Ethics. Encyclopedia Britannica; 2023, December 26. Available:

D’Angelo J. Ethics in science: Ethical misconduct in scientific research. CRC Press; 2012.

Dyer AR. Ethics and psychiatry: Toward professional definition. American Psychiatric Association; 1988.

Perkins HS. Ethics expertise and cultural competence. AMA Journal of Ethics. 2006; 8(2):79–83. Available:

McNamee M. Sport, ethics and philosophy: A 10 year retrospective. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. 2017;11(1):1–2. Available:

Brady ME. Keynes’s application of virtue ethics in the general theory in chapter 9. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2018. Available:

Glattke TJ. International research collaborations: Ethical and regulatory considerations. The ASHA Leader. 2007; 12(17):19–21. Available:

Anonymous III. Anonymous ethical investigations? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1995;26(6):629. Available:

Calman SK. Conducting research ethically in developing countries. Drug Discovery Today. 2002;7(23):1155–1159. Available:

Archard D. Informed consent: Autonomy and self-ownership. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2008;25(1):19–34. Available:

Cohen S. The nocebo effect of informed consent. Bioethics. 2012;28(3):147–154. Available:

Sallam R. The placebo/nocebo effect. Al-Azhar Medical Journal. 2015;42(1):1-3. Available:

Oluchi AAJ. History and importance of informed consent in health care. SSRN Electronic Journal; 2013. Available:

Wiles R, Crow G, Heath S, Charles V. The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2008;11(5):417–428. Available:

King NAS, Kyando N, Massoi L. The challenges of confidentiality and anonymity in undertaking scientific research. International Journal of Social Science Research. 2014;2(2):47. Available:

Dougherty M. The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics. 2021;17(4):480–500. Available:

Rodgers W, Nolte M. Solving problems of disclosure risk in an academic setting: Using a combination of restricted data and restricted access methods. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2006;1(3):85–97.

Hammouchi H, Cherqi O, Mezzour G, Ghogho M, Koutbi ME. Digging deeper into data breaches: An exploratory data analysis of hacking breaches over time. Procedia Computer Science. 2019;151: 1004–1009. Available:

AERA guidelines for eliminating race and sex bias in educational research and evaluation. Educational Researcher. 1985; 14(6):16–17. Available:

Ross S. Morality, teleology, objectivity, authority. The Philosophical Forum. 2013; 44(4):373–393. Available:

Forster P. Objectivity in science and objectivity in ethics: Quine versus Putnam and Rorty. The Philosophical Forum. 2017;48(3):241–271. Available:

Endacott R. Objectivity in observation. Nurse Researcher. 1994;2(2):30–40. Available:

Elliott J. Objectivity, ideology, and teacher participation in educational research. Research Intelligence. 1975;1(2):43– 45. Available:

Esarey J, Valdes N. Unbiased, reliable, and valid student evaluations can still be unfair. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020;45(8):1106–1120. Available:

Xu Q, Ahmadi E, Amini A, Rus D, Lo AW. Identifying and mitigating potential biases in predicting drug approvals. Drug Safety. 2022;45(5):521–533. Available:

Hill DA. Data collection and analysis. Physiotherapy. 1998;84(10):516. Available:

McNiece R, Bidgood P, Soan P. An investigation into using national longitudinal studies to examine trends in educational attainment and development. Educational Research. 2004;46(2):119–136. Available:

Niemierko A, Goitein M. Random sampling for evaluating treatment plans. Medical Physics. 1990;17(5):753–762. Available:

Fawson PC, Ludlow BC, Reutzel DR, Sudweeks R, Smith JA. Examining the reliability of running records: Attaining generalisable results. The Journal of Educational Research. 2006;100(2):113–126. Available:

Alam S, Patel J. Peer review: Tips from field experts for junior reviewers. BMC Medicine. 2015;13(1). Available:

Rezaeian M. The world of research and its mysteries: transparency and honesty. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2021;20(7):731–732. Available:

Byerly TR. Intellectual honesty and intellectual transparency. Episteme. 2022; 20(2):410–428. Available:

Gelman A. Ethics and Statistics: Honesty and transparency are not enough. Chance. 2017;30(1):37–39. Available:

Nickel JC. Building a foundation of honesty, integrity and transparency. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2014;8(1–2):17. Available:

Schutz RE. Ethical standards for research in education. Educational Researcher. 1973;2(2):3–5. Available:

American Educational Research Association. Ethical standards of the American Educational Research Association. Educational Researcher. 1992;21(7):23–26. Available:

American Educational Research Association. Code of Ethics. Educational Researcher. 2011;40(3):145–156. Available:

Phillips SR. Asking the sensitive question: The ethics of survey research and teen sex. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research. 1994;16(6):1–7. Available:

Kennedy JM. Institutional review boards and institutional researchers. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2005; (127):17–31. Available:

Levine RJ. Institutional review boards. BMJ. 1989;298(6683):1268–1269. Available:

Pritchard I. Institutional review boards. Educational Researcher. 1994;23(5):4. Available:

Lee FJ. Institutional review boards. The Guthrie Journal. 2002;71(4):133–134. Available:

Moon MR. The history and role of institutional review boards: A useful tension. AMA Journal of Ethics. 2009; 11(4):311–321. Available:

Chapman-Cliburn G. Institutional review boards and quality. QRB - Quality Review Bulletin. 1986;12(4):141–143. Available: